Formula One… The cutting edge of technology?
One of the recent headlines in Formula One has been the possible introduction of budget caps. When a steering wheel costs £13,000 and the typical costs of running a team are nigh on £100 million it was only a matter of time before yet another rule to allow the smaller teams to compete on a slightly more level playing field was introduced.
It may seem unrealistic that the cost of running these machines could be anything but sky-high, but if American Airlines managed to save $40,000 in 1987 by merely taking out one olive from their first class salads, anything is possible.
The plans are still just that; plans, but it is clear that something will be done in the future. We are in the middle of an engine freeze and that certainly seems to be working (depending on which angle you look at it from).
There is an argument however, that Formula One is the pinnacle of motoring technology and warrants large expenditure. Teams often say how some of their technology is passed down to the road division, some tending to publicise this at every given opportunity. If we regulate the cost of Grand Prix racing surely this will also slow down road car development?
Of course the ever-changing regulations mean that the Formula 1 cars we see today look nothing like what could be if the designers were allowed a free reign. I suggest the end product would be so otherworldly that no human being could physically drive one. Of course this is the main limiting factor but the budget cap will slow the process even further.
If we don’t want to scare away the smaller teams but also want to see machines racing to the maximum of their potential (within the rules) where does that lead us? Well, as the FIA will tell you, to a bit of a conundrum. Formula One would hardly be worth watching with only 5 teams on the grid. How about slackening the regulations and giving each team say, £70 million a season. They can then do with it what they will as long as they race at each event. They would then have to decide whether it is worth paying a high-profile driver £30 million or spending half that and the rest on development. The money would be easy to find, £70 million would just mean removing an olive from everybody’s salad. Almost.
The budget cap is a good idea but let’s hope that it doesn’t stunt the growth of the sport.
Filed under: Blogs, Formula 1, Miscellaneous
Tags: FIA, Formula One
Ed returned from a stint in Milan, working on the Italian version of Autocar, and joined the team in August 2007. After two years of countless scooter accidents and a constant battle against coffee addiction it was a relief for him to start writing in his mother tongue. As well as managing the website, Ed is responsible for writing the Auctions and Desirables pages, the occasional features article and made his TV debut on CNN at the end of last year commenting on the F1 season.
Vittorio84:
February 11th, 2008 11:08am
The story of the olive and the American Airlines say all. Anything is possible, but my idea is that, before taking any decision on other matters, F1 teams should reduce the days of testing and test in front of the fans on fridays and saturdays during race week-end.
Kathryn Boyes:
February 13th, 2008 9:26pm
I have watched the cost of Formula 1 go up and up and meanwhile my enjoyment of the racing has gone down and down.
All that money - and for what!
My biggest dismay was when Michael Schumacher’s salary at Ferrari was made public knowledge. What a waste I thought. His salary could have been halved and he would still never had money issues. Nobody needs that much money.
Think what good uses that money could be put to rather than it just lying in the bank (as he couldn’t possibly spend that much) earning interest.
I have similar thoughts about footballers salaries.
Alan in Victoria:
February 19th, 2008 8:13pm
Stunt the growth of the sport, you say? You mean the commercial promotion of the sport, I take it. Technically, GP racing died years ago. ( Adding on little winglets here and there does not count as technology.)